Crusader Fortress Blog
On Thursday, we toured an Crusader Fortress in the Galilee. The era of the crusades
is the time period generally from 1100-1300, in which Christian Knights returned to the
Holy Land to retake it from Muslim Rule. There is a lot of mysticism and glamour
regarding the crusades as a religious conquest or a quest for the Holy Grail. The
Crusades began in 1095 when Pope Urban II urged for troops to conquer the Turks
and retake Israel. Jerusalem fell in 1099. After this there were a series of crusades as
the Muslims pushed back with it ending in the 1200s, correlating with the rise of Mamluk
rule of Israel.
The Fortress itself was very interesting. With its dark basalt walls, and its interwoven
secret passageways, the fortress is living testament to the time of the Crusaders.
The castle itself dates back to the 12th century. Its purpose was defend the newly
conquered kingdom of Jerusalem. In 1189, the fortress finally fell to Saladin's forces
after a year and a half siege, a few years after the battle of the Horns of Hattin. The
site laid in wait until archeologists in the 1960s began to excavate it. The fortress itself
is composed of many defense features. This includes its deep land mote and high steep
walls. Also the its secret escape routes and archer towers.
But there is another narrative about the crusades that goes fairly untold. And that is
the slaughter of thousands of Jews on there way to the Holy Land. The Age of Legend
of knights and kings also has a deep underlying theme of anti-semitism. The glorified
story of the noble knights who fought to retake their holy city is an utter lie in spite of
the numerous atrocities they committed. While persecution of Jews has existed since
biblical times, the routes of modern day anti-semitism begin in this era, the Middle Ages.
Ultimately the Jews are seen as Christ-Killers which a lot of hate stems from. And it
doesn’t help when the Pope accuses an entire people of deicide, or the murder of G-d.
But anti-semitism during this time can be divided into three main tropes.
Firstly is something called the Blood Libels. In some village somewhere in Europe,
a child is murdered. The only explanation is that the Jews were behind it. There is no
historical evidence of the Jews murdering children. Can we prove a Jew didn’t murder
this specific child in this specific village, no. But what comes after is what is more important.
After events like this, people start to believe that the Jews are ritually murdering children,
and using their blood in religious rituals like baking matzah for Pesach. Blood Libels
spread across Europe. What kind of hate can inspire such a lie? That the Jews are
murdering children for their blood, it’s unbelievable to a modern lens.
Second comes the desecration of the host. In Catholicism, there is a ritual in which church
goers drink wine and eat a wafer which represent the blood and body of Christ. The wafer
itself is referred to as the host. Rumors start to spread during the medieval ages that Jews
would go into churches and stab the host, the wafer. Supposedly, when they did this, the
wafer would bleed, as if they were murdering Christ a second time. This form of
anti-semitism relates specifically back to the before-mentioned idea of Deicide, or
the murder of G-d. This idea of deicide is a trope of anti-semitism that is still very
prevalent today, that the Jews killed Jesus. First off, the Jews were not directly responsible
for Jesus’ death. Rome executed him, and more specifically a man by the name of
Pontius Pilate. The New Testament portrays Pilate as sympathetic character that did
not want to kill Christ. Yet, other historical documents beg to differ. According to
Josephus’ account, Pilate was a headstrong authoritarian with a goal to provoke the
Jewish People. So the blatant statement that Jews are responsible for Christ’s death,
is an utter lie.
Lastly, the third trope of anti-semitism to evolve during this time was the poisoning
of the wells. It can be argued that the most defining event of the Middle Ages was the
Black Plague. Highest estimates reach around 60% to the amount of people killed by
the plague in Europe. And while Jews did suffer from the plague, because of our isolation
and the fact that we ate our own meat, the plague did not affect us as bad. This led to the
assumption that since the Jews were not getting sick, they must be responsible. Jews
across Europe were blamed for poisoning the wells therefor spreading the plague. It’s
no small thing to be blamed for a disease that killed 60% of Europe's entire population.
So the untold story of the crusade is anti-semitism. Underneath all the lore and
valor of the knights is the slaughter of thousands of our people. Never forget. But I’ll
leave you with a couple questions. How do these ancient forms of anti-semitism relate
to more modern stigmas regarding Jews? If you wish to share, what forms of anti-semitism
have you experienced in your life in America? And to what extent, if at all, should Europe
bare the weight of these atrocities, even though they were committed almost a thousand
years ago?
Many of the forms of anti-Semitism we face today seem very disperate from the three main kinds we discussed in the crusader fortress but across the board antisemetic ideas tend to stem from a consideeatioc of Jews being the other or a scapegoat for current provlems, whether that means the black plague or the refugee crisis. The idea of whether or not modern countries and people still carry responsibility for their past mistakes is a long and complicated debate but certainly the current system of ignoring or refusing to address past attrocities is not acceptable at all, especially in a world where persecution and oppression still continues.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the way that Europe should handle the atrocities of antisemitism committed thousands of years ago, I think that it is important for a nation to realize the mistakes it has made, no matter how recently on history it happened. Especially since antisemitism is so prevalent in today's world, I think that it is an important topic to address.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the way that Europe should handle the atrocities of antisemitism committed thousands of years ago, I think that it is important for a nation to realize the mistakes it has made, no matter how recently on history it happened. Especially since antisemitism is so prevalent in today's world, I think that it is an important topic to address.
ReplyDeleteModern anti-semitism isn't too similar to the anti-semitism of the Crusades. However, the idea that the Jews are to blame for the world's problems directly relates to the Holocaust, a relatively modern event. Anti-semitism for me has existed through snark comments or jokes about Jews from my peers; I have been lucky enough to never feel directly threatened by anti-semitism, though. Similarly to Sylvia, I think it is important for nations to recognize their past, however because the Crusades happened so long ago and the world has progressed so much, I don't think there should be much resentment towards Europe for killing the Jews in the early 1000's.
ReplyDeleteThe few times that we talked about our own personal encounters with anti-semitism, I realized that the scale is much wider that I ever thought. I started to feel like I don't truly know what it's like to be a Jew in America. In my neighborhood the population is 50% Jewish. I've also always gone to school with only Jews. This tiyul and conversations with classmates has taught me so much.
ReplyDeleteWhile Christians in Europe have committed horrible atrocities, and they should learn about them as to truly understand their past. It is unfair to ask them to pay reparations for ancestors so far back they cannot even name. And while anti-semitism is still prevalent in America it is no where near as bad as medieval Europe. Sure their are horrible atrocities like in the case of Leo Frank, but for the most part Jews in the US have not had to fear for their lives.
ReplyDeleteI feel that in the modern era, Judaism isn’t threatened the way it was during the Crusades. That being so, Europe should keep the awareness of the severity the Crusades held on, not only Jews, but every group that was affected. It was terrible, yes, but grudges should not be held by the Jewish people against any ancient enemies, they’ve got enough on their plate. Modern day antisemetism definitely derived from the same fear (judeaphobism) the crusaders felt, but the expression of the times has significantly changed.
ReplyDelete